About Me

Name: Patrick Henry
Location: Vancouver, WA
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

MUMBAI: MONUMENT TO A WORLD GONE MAD

 
 
   At this writing 125 persons are known dead, and nearly four-hundred more wounded
 
in a vicious attack by Muslim extremists against a train station, a restaurant, three hotels
 
and a Jewish center. And already the America-baiters are lining up to rationalize just
 
what made these poor, aggrieved Muslim boys go so wrong.
 
   We read in Time about tragic British mistakes made in their colonial days, and the
 
persecution of the (14%) Muslim population in India by the (80%) Hindu populace.
 
Yet it wasn't the Hindi these terrorists sought out as hostages. It was American and
 
British citizens. It's the tired old business of shooting the pig because he saw the fox
 
steal the chickens. Everybody in the world with a grievance targets the USA. Why?
 
Some of them think we're to blame for whatever ails them, and the rest think we're the
 
only ones who can really do anything about their plight. I know I'm certainly more
 
anxious to help Indian Muslims now that they've slaughtered innocent civilians. Aren't
 
you?
 
   But the real problem here isn't the terrorist nut jobs who pulled off the Mumbai
 
massacre, or the Palestinian backpack bombers, or even Al Qaeda. The real problem
 
is a world that refers to such murdering thugs as "militants," news services such as
 
Reuters that will NEVER apply the term "terrorist" to someone who blows things and
 
people up for a deeply felt cause. We saw it in America recently when the National
 
Education Association petition decrying the demonization of domestic terrorist
 
William Ayers argued that the charges against him were "just history," and that he
 
acted as he did -- blowing up police stations and government buildings -- because
 
he felt passionately about his (anti-war) cause. If that's an example of the reasoning
 
of our teachers, no wonder so much of public education in America today sucks!
 
   But I guess their position -- and that of many in the media and in public life all
 
over the world -- is that if you have a grievance you have a certain license to break
 
the law, destroy property and even kill people without being labeled a filthy criminal
 
or paying the full fare for your crimes. By that sick logic if you happen to be black,
 
slavery permits you open season on whites. If you're fat and were ridiculed for it, fire
 
at will on those skinnier than you. And if you believe God's on your side, as the
 
Muslims do, well, that gives you a double free pass. So, let's all line up and
 
practice political correctness until the terrorists run the whole world. Or better
 
yet, let's cluck our tongues and look the other way in hopes that when we get
 
really ticked about something we'll also be able to find a building to torch or an
 
unarmed civilian to shoot.
 
   Compicating the Mumbai scenario is the apparent fact that the terrorists were
 
not Indian Muslims at all, but sailed to India on a ship originating in Karachi,
 
Pakistan. And Pakistan's take? Who, us? We don't know anything about such a
 
ship. This from a Muslim country that hates India and the Hindi and who can
 
never seem to get hold of "actionable intelligence" to go after bin Laden or
 
Alzawahiri who everyone knows live in their half-assed country -- whose own
 
intel apparatus is so riddled with Taliban that they couldn't do anything with such
 
information if they had it.
 
   Murder by the aggrieved is still murder! People who do dastardly deeds while
 
hiding behind their religion are STILL criminals. They are not heroes, they are
 
not soldiers and they wouldn't recognize honor if it snuck up and bit them on
 
the backside. You will NEVER hear this on MSNBC, or read it on CNN. No,
 
one way or another they'll find some way to blame Mumbai on America. And
 
their example heralds the death of any pretense of intellectual honesty in the
 
American media. Apparently they've caught the virus from Reuters and the National
 
Education Association.
 
   The bottom line is this: the world is awash in the blood of innocents killed by
 
the aggrieved and religious fanatics. And until right thinking people have the
 
courage to say ENOUGH, and call these actions and crimnals what they really are,
 
they will go on bombing, murdering, burning and taking hostages. And those not
 
killed in the process will likely walk away unpunished. It's a world gone mad!
Tags: Security  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WHEN IT QUACKS LIKE A DUCK

 
 
   India's financial capital is on fire. New York's subways are under threat of attack.
 
A suicide truck bomber attacks the American embassy in Afghanistan during a
 
Thanksgiving celebration. Terrorists assault the U.S. embassy in Yemen, killing both
 
men and women. Eighteen female suicide bombers surrender to U.S. forces in Iraq.
 
What do these purveyors of terror and bloodshed have in common? They're all stone
 
killers, and they're all Muslims.
 
   Now, before you go off on me for racism or profiling, hear me out. The foregoing
 
actions, clearly documented and very much in the news over the last couple of weeks
 
cannot simply be brushed aside as by-products of "American imperialism" -- a favorite
 
and vapid slogan of the left which is lacking in both substance and historical grounds.
 
And it is not as though Christian extremists have not committed unjust and barbarous
 
acts at other times in history, as the Crusades and Torquemada's Inquisition bear grim
 
witness. But this is the 21st century, and the people gearing up in explosive vests,
 
making car bombs and murdering civilians are not Christians, or Jews, or
 
Buddhists. They are overwhelmingly Muslims.
 
   So what is it that leads Muslims daily to do murder, targeting primarily Western
 
and Israeli civilians? Why is it that they feel justified in their bent to kill in God's
 
name? We have all heard the protestations from religious scholars and moderate
 
Muslims that these are just the fringe radicals, and that Islam is a religion of peace.
 
But in the real world, nobody's afraid to get on an airplane with a Catholic priest
 
or the Dalai Lama. So why do we mistrust Muslims, and not those of other faiths
 
cultures and persuasions?
 
   If you are a one-worlder or left-winger who ultimately blames all evil on America,
 
the "great Satan," then you'll want to stop reading right now. If, however, you are
 
open to persuasion by facts, please read on.
 
   All fanaticism is dangerous. And those fanatics who are most dangerous are those
 
who believe God wills, condones and blesses the violence they commit. One of the
 
famed "Five Pillars of Islam" is the concept of jihad, or struggle. Moderately under-
 
stood, jihad  simply means that the good Muslim is obligated to struggle in life to
 
make his own life and those of the people around him or her a better one. A part of
 
the concept includes the obligation to help a fellow Muslim in his or her own jihad.
 
But Muslim hardliners through the centuries have expanded the meaning of jihad to
 
include the conversion of the entire world, by force if necessary, to Islam. Notable
 
among such is the Wahabi sect of Islam, of which Osama bin Laden is a notorious
 
devotee.
 
   Not only is such a belief inherently dangerous, it is supported by the reported
 
actions of the prophet Muhammad himself, who committed wanton acts of rape
 
and murder against those who did not accept him as the one true prophet of Allah.
 
No "turn the other cheek," or "walk the second mile," for him, nor did he chastise
 
his followers for taking the sword on his behalf, as Jesus did. It's all right there
 
in the Quran. It should not be surprising, then, that Muslims who feel politically
 
aggrieved  or culturally violated tend to justify violence aganist others as their
 
legitimate jihad. The fact is that the "one world" ideology, in the mind of the
 
radicalized Muslim, is one world under Islam. Not quite what you lefties had
 
in mind, is it?
 
   But in a world gone mad, singling out Muslims for scrutiny at security check-
 
points is "racist profiling." Never mind that they're the only ones known to be
 
planning attacks on civilian targets. And we dare not say out loud that the notion
 
of jihad, as interpreted by Al Qaeda and their ilk is pure evil, and unworthy of
 
protected status as a "religious belief." And when nearly all the 9/11 attackers
 
are from Saudi Arabia, it is important that we go out of our way to soul search and
 
perhaps blame their extremism on "evil America," or hatch conspiracy theories
 
blaming the American or Israeli governments. If it walks like a duck and quacks
 
like a duck, why can't it ever just BE a duck?
 
   So here's a parting shot to you politically correct, left wing elitists. Let's send
 
the lot of you abroad as ambassadors of goodwill to sell your one world hogwash
 
to bin Laden or Al Zawahiri. Maybe they'll let you write and post a note just before
 
they cut your throats. But those of us in the real world will still hold that no religion
 
-- including Islam -- can legitimately justify killing in the name of God or religion,
 
and that those who do so are just plain murderers -- no excuses, no free passes, no
 
mitigation, just criminals. And they must be dealt with as such. Certainly we have
 
heard some condemnation of this wanton killing by moderate Muslims. But on
 
volume and stridence it falls well short, because many believe that even though they
 
don't share the Wahabist interpretation of jihad, they are obligated to support, at
 
least passively, their brethren who do. Until we can stop tiptoeing around political
 
correctness and talk openly about the moral vacuity of such a belief, little in the
 
world is likely to change.
Tags: Security  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »